NextPrevious

The Warren Court (1953–69)

Criminal Procedure and Constitutional Rights

What did the Warren Court rule about guilty pleas?

The Warren Court determined in Boykin v. Alabama (1969) that trial judges must ensure that criminal defendants understand and agree to the waiver of their constitutional rights when they plead guilty to criminal offenses. The case involved a twenty-seven-year-old African American defendant Edward Boykin, Jr., who pled guilty to five counts of robbery. The trial judge accepted Boykin’s plea without inquiring whether he understood the consequences of such action. A jury sentenced Boykin to death. The U.S. Supreme Court wrote that “it was error … for the trial judge to accept petitioner’s [Boykin’s] guilty plea without an affirmative showing that it was intelligent and voluntary.”



Close

This is a web preview of the "The Handy Supreme Court Answer Book" app. Many features only work on your mobile device. If you like what you see, we hope you will consider buying. Get the App